John Cusack, Woody Harrelson, Thandie Newton

An academic researcher leads a group of people in a fight to counteract the apocalyptic events that were predicted by the ancient Mayan calendar.

Flixster Users

68% liked it

326,568 ratings

Critics

37% liked it

202 critics

PG-13, 2 hrs. 38 min.

Directed by: Roland Emmerich

Release Date: November 13, 2009

Invite friends to see Get Showtimes

Stats: 25,573 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating
Share on: Facebook Twitter

Flixster Reviews (25,573)


  • November 30, 2009
    Independence Day, Day After Tomorrow, Godzilla...Nobody but Nobody does end-of-the-world mass destruction like Roland Emmerich. The man has certainly found his niche. He has a formula, and 2012 is no different. It essentially boils down to 30 minutes of character setup ...( read more)followed by two straight hours of destructo-porn - just money shot after money shot after money shot (unfortunately almost all of which were shown in the trailers).

    Is it believable? HELL no. Much of it borders on ludicrous. There are scenes of the characters outrunning nature that make Day After Tomorrow's laughable "outrunning the cold air" scene seem downright realistic. But is it fun? Yes. You know what you're getting into going into an Emmerich film, and he delivers exactly that.

    A cast of great actors including John Cusack, Chiwetol Ejiofor, and Oliver Platt really helps to give the film what little weight it has, despite the cliched dialogue.
  • November 30, 2009
    "The world, as we know, will come to an end soon."


    In his book Apocalypse Movies: End of the World Cinema, author Kim Newman noted that "The more complicated a civilization becomes, the more fun it is to imagine the whole works going up in flames". Roland

    ...( read more) Emmerich has clearly taken Newman's words to heart, as his career has been built almost exclusively on disaster films; allowing movie-goers to vicariously experience the destruction of Earth via aliens in Independence Day, an atomic-spawned monstrosity in Godzilla and an ice age in The Day After Tomorrow. Why the obliteration of our world is so enjoyable in the eyes of the movie-going public is probably best left to theologians and psychologists, but Emmerich is visibly in tune with it and knows how to exploit it. And for his latest opus, 2012, the director has considerably upped the ante by imagining a true end-of-the-world scenario packed with an incredible assortment of catastrophic destruction. The film operates under the assumption that if we enjoyed seeing isolated mayhem in other disaster flicks, movie-goers will really love witnessing widespread global destruction. Thankfully, it works - this is awesome entertainment.


    2012 plays with the theory of the Mayan calendar that the world will end on December 21, 2012. But by conducting a little research on this topic, one will find that there were several other calendars devised around the time of the Mayans, yet only one contained lithographs that appear to be a warning. The only thing scientists can agree on about this calendar is that it simply ends on the feared date before it begins again from zero. There's simply no evidence to suggest the apocalypse will be brought on - doomsayers are just always looking for the next possible date for Earth's destruction (wasn't the world meant to end in the year 2000?). However the Mayan theory is hardly mentioned in this film - it's just a selling point, as well as an excuse for the end of the world to be brought on. From there, the filmmakers have devised a few stabs at hard science that seem convincing on the surface but probably wouldn't pass muster in a high school science course. But all this justification is just smoke and mirrors, because the money is instead in the grandiosity of the disaster.


    Speaking from a narrative perspective, 2012 adheres closely to the '70s-era Irwin Allen-style of disaster movies in which a broad array of characters are brought together because of a disaster. The representative Everyman here is divorced, fledging novelist Jackson Curtis, whose ex-wife Kate (Peet) is dating successful plastic surgeon Gordon (McCarthy). Jackson's kids even prefer Gordon over him (notice the clichés so far). As for the earnest professional who discovers the impending destruction of Earth, there's government geologist Adrian Helmsley (Ejiofor). The science behind this apocalypse is simple: the Earth begins to heat up from within due to being pelted with intensifying radioactive particles from the sun, causing the planet's crust to break apart and shift. Cue the rollicking silliness. This includes plenty of conventional scenarios that have played out in films since 1980: the eleventh-hour miscalculation that results in the timer speeding up for the impending disaster, the noble daughter who outlives her father, the divorcee who falls back in love, and the character with two days of pilot training who is perfectly able to repeatedly fly everyone to safety.


    Too many simultaneous plotlines have always been a key weakness of disaster movies, and 2012 is no different. At about 150 minutes, the length of this movie is indefensible. The script is an appalling concoction of cheesy expository dialogue, painful chunks of ham-fisted character development and blatant contrivances designed solely to bring the characters together and advance the plot. Adding insult to injury, the action doesn't start until about 45 minutes of the runtime have passed! Over-explaining the ludicrous science unfortunately results in both sheer boredom and a chance for the audience to mentally dissect the holes in the theory. Since this is meant to be a big Hollywood disaster movie, it's a considerable problem that it takes so long for the action to start. As a side note, the concept of destroying the world is a non-starter from a dramatic perspective. After all, if the story sticks to its guns and the planet is destroyed, it would end on a depressing note that denies viewers the climactic catharsis they'd be expecting. And if the film concludes on a happy note, the whole thing feels as if it was crafted by a studio system willing to sacrifice the integrity of the premise. Alas, the film ends with a tacked-on, embarrassingly saccharine-coated Hollywood ending.


    Of course, the average movie-goer doesn't care about the characters or the script, which is good since both are flimsy in the case of 2012. The driving motivation for anyone to see this movie is the mayhem... And boy does Emmerich get that aspect right. As a film which delivers epic destruction, 2012 is unparalleled. Absolutely everything one could want in a disaster epic can be found in this film. Everything. There are earthquakes, volcanos, collapsing skyscrapers, tsunamis, capsized ocean liners, plain crashes, and more. Normal disaster movies kill thousands, while 2012 kills billions without breaking a sweat. The money shots are impeccably sold by the special effects crew who deliver vast images of doom with remarkable detail - the CGI is amazingly close to photorealism. There's some truly multiplex-rocking action to behold within this flick, such as the jaw-droppingly orchestrated and utterly gripping "California is going down" sequence. Reports of the budget for this film range from $200 million to $260 million, and no money went to waste. While plenty of action and a weak human element is a basis to hopelessly hate a movie, Emmerich has an advantage over films like the latest Transformers - he's a good filmmaker. Emmerich has sound knowledge of how to construct breathtaking imagery and action without resorting to a dozen camera edits in a matter of seconds or distracting shaky-cam. He allows his audience to actually watch the mayhem rather than opting for cinematic techniques that induce headaches.


    The disaster sequences, while nail-biting, are also preposterous and far too Hollywood. As the destruction commences, Jackson and his family manage to outrace it all without a single hiccup. Later, the concept of outrunning a fireball is reduced to the level of a nursery school feat. The Hollywood-style split-second precision grows irritating rather quickly, with planes taking off at the exact moment the ground gives way. And when the protagonists arrive in Vegas, networks are still broadcasting on television...are the power grids unaffected by the chaos? More stupidity arises when the government commissions the construction of massive arks to save what is left of the human population: these structures are built extremely close to each other, so guess what will happen when all the flood waters rush in at extreme velocity? On top of all this nonsense, there's improbable cell phone reception, an awful Arnold Schwarzenegger vocal imitator, and surveillance cameras with unlikely range.


    Is there any reason to care about the characters? Absolutely not - they are caricatures saddled with threadbare motivation and bad dialogue. The cast is more formidable than one might expect from a glorified B-movie, but the acting is still pretty below-par. Thus, 2012 only works when it immerses viewers in the epic action set-pieces rather than trying to develop characters or dole out exposition. It's a highly enjoyable, paint-by-numbers disaster movie which contains some absolutely breathtaking popcorn moments.

  • November 29, 2009
    Review Coming
  • November 28, 2009
    On the edge of my seat John Cusack entertainment. This flick was much better than I thought it was going to be. I knew it was going to be ridiculous, and it was (the disaster movie to end ALL disaster movies), but the 2nd half of the movie was actually fresh and incredibly inte...( read more)nse. I was able to shut my brain off without detaching from the movie...and gosh darn it all, I actually almost teared up at the end of this monster. Wow.

    It was like going on a blind date ONCE again, and having been on 39 previous dates with toothless hookers. Sure, they were willing to put out with big explosions and wowie-zowie CGI effects, but in the end, it was just toothless hookers. But the 40th blind date, this hooker's got some class! Sure, I'm not going to give her a call once its all over, but I don't feel like an idiot for sleeping with her.

    And that's all that matters!
  • November 21, 2009
    Really enthralling story. It keeps you fixated from start to finish. Loved it!
  • November 30, 2009
    interesting but very frightening..
  • November 30, 2009
    Here, Roland Emmerich destroyed the Earth bigtime! This is by far the most disastrous film.. well.. in cinematic sense.. (I think "Knowing" is far more destructive and the world actually ended with zero survivor.. well.. except for those two kids.. and a bunch of aliens)
    Visually...( read more) spectacular, nevermind how many billions of people died, just watching that limo jumping from a fault to fault to inside a falling building is one hell of a ride!
  • November 30, 2009
    i never imagine this will happen to this world
  • November 30, 2009
    GREAT DESSASTER MOVIE!!!
  • November 30, 2009
    want 2 watch looks so interesting

Critic Reviews


November 16, 2009
A.O. Scott, At the Movies

Even though this movie's running time of two and a half hours is about one hour too long, there's still some pretty cool disaster stuff on the way. full review

November 16, 2009
Anthony Lane, The New Yorker

2012 is so long, and its special effects are at once so outrageous and so thunderously predictable, that by the time I lurched from the theatre I felt that three years had actually passed and that the... full review

November 13, 2009
Edward Havens, FilmJerk.com

Why does Roland Emmerich enjoy killing off humanity? full review

November 13, 2009
Joe Morgenstern, Wall Street Journal

This oafish epic about the End of Days -- as predicted by the Mayan calendar -- operates in a dead zone roughly equidistant between parody and idiocy. full review

November 13, 2009
Claudia Puig, USA Today

The movie is an undeniable visual spectacle, but just as unequivocally a cheesy, ridiculous story. full review

November 13, 2009
Nigel Andrews, The Financial Times

Roland Emmerich is an apocalypse chef. In 2012 he cooks America till it boils, adding live meat to the process at judicious intervals. full review

November 12, 2009
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

Beware 2012, which works the dubious miracle of almost matching Transformers 2 for sheer, cynical, mind-numbing, time-wasting, money-draining, soul-sucking stupidity. full review

November 12, 2009
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

The effects are expensive-looking and impressive enough while you're watching them, although whatever awe they inspire doesn't last long: When you've seen one Washington Monument fall to bits, you've ... full review

November 12, 2009
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

People talk about "formula" almost always as a pejorative, but formulas get to be formulas because they work, and there's something to be said for a formula picture done almost to perfection. full review

November 12, 2009
Colin Covert, The Minneapolis Star Tribune

Films of this sort are plotted shish kebab style: disaster, change of scenery, new disaster. But on the level of spectacle, 2012 is top-notch. full review

View more 2012 reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • norardzmtz80
    November 30, 2009
    NI YO QUE SOY MEXICANA CREO EN ESA PROFECIA DE LOS MAYAS NO SE COMO LA DEMAS GENTE SE SUGESTIONA,PERO LO QUE ADMIRO ES LA IMAGINACION DE LOS PRODUCTORES DE 2012
  • amazon9
    November 28, 2009
    Watch at Dalster com all videos working, you do have to fill out a quick survey, but It's well worth the 30 seconds.
  • konnehousmane
    November 26, 2009
    nice show
  • OsMaAaRdi
    November 25, 2009
    it's the greatest movie i've ever seen !
    el 3ama ma ajmalo !
    it's really an amazing movie ! wow
    and he's really a wonderful director! :P
  • Sweetfaceashari
    November 24, 2009
    This movie is very stupid because the world is not going to come to an end in 2012, Not even jesus the son of God is going to know when, so they need to stop all their petty allegations and just trust in the word of God. For all we know it could be tomorrow or the day after and so on, no one except God himself knows and they will pay for all this blasphemey they are bringing to Gods name and the way they are leading Gods people astray. (Proverbs 28:10); Whoso causeth the righteous to astray in an evil way he shall fall himself into his own pit but the upright shall have good things in possession. And whether they believe it or not God is real and all man would have to give an account to him for everything they ever said or done whether it is good or bad.
  • pimplex69
    November 24, 2009
    Good Movie
  • amazon9
    November 23, 2009
    found this movie over at http://dalster.com after doing that quick little survey thing.
  • dancergirlvw
    November 19, 2009
    Wow. It sounds a little bit idiotic in my mind... I don't know. One of my friends was on MSN with me while watching this and was telling me how bad it was and how much he hated it and almost laughed because it was so ridiculous.

    "OF COURSE SOME RELIGIOUS LADY TELLS EVERYONE TO GO TO A TEMPLE! THE WORLD'S ENDING OF COURSE THAT'S GOING TO HELP!"

    I definitely do not want to see this movie. It sounds ridiculous.
  • NOORAISSA
    November 17, 2009
    tomorraw im gonna watch it...

    i guess its one of the best movies..
  • fearfearitsselfe
    November 15, 2009
    first off yes very good effects has you on the edge of your seat....but the hole reason i hated this film is because 1 just the media and fear mongers alone have struck fear into so many peoples hearts especially children that are worried about the end of the world and then this? a major block buster? just for amusement? hollywood is starting to loose all sense of morality....my 7 year old brother came home from school scared about this topic.....roland emmerich should be ashamed and if this does happen kick his ass off the boat take care

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Knowing
    Knowing (81%)
  • The Day the Earth Stood Still
    The Day the Earth Stood Still (81%)
  • The Day After Tomorrow
    The Day After Tomorrow (95%)
  • Akira
    Akira (23%)

Facts


  • DVD Easter Egg:
    How to find it:
    :O
    What happens:
    :P

Theater Showtimes


No showtimes found.

2012 : Watch Free on TV


2012 Trivia


  • The national weather center says there are unique climate changes all over in 2012 Doomsday ?  Answer »
  • Carl believes earths rotation is slowly aligning with the black hole in 2012 Doomsday ?   Answer »
  • Where was Lloyd at in 2012 Doomsday ?  Answer »
  • What was Sarah looking to find in 2012 Doomsday ?  Answer »

Most Popular Skin