Aaron Johnson, Brian Caspe, Dusan Fager

Set in early 20th-century Vienna, a stage magician uses his magic to win back the great love of his life from a brutal enemy, her fiance, who is also the powerful crowned prince of Austria.

Flixster Users

83% liked it

382,715 ratings

Critics

74% liked it

173 critics

PG-13, 1 hr. 50 min.

Directed by: Neil Burger

Release Date: August 18, 2006

Invite friends to see

DVD Release Date: January 9, 2007

Get It:

Stats: 32,518 reviews

Get movie widget Recommend it Add to Favorites

Your Rating



clear rating

Flixster Reviews (32,518)


  • November 6, 2009
    i remember "the illusionist" came out around the same time as "the prestiege". while "the illusionist" fails to be quite as good it's the first time i've seen norton in a serious film for ages... and at last!!! how long i've been waiting... he can still act too! it's better than ...( read more)christian bales poor english accent anyway which consists of him talking in a slightly deeper voice, or was that his batman voice? oh wait...

    yes... edward norton acting again is great but the film itself is marginally less great
  • September 16, 2009
    Flawed. It asks big questions and gives you no real answer. Lazy film making!!
  • June 6, 2009
    Un homme très propre avec une « belle gueule » qui fait de la magie, qui fait se que tout jeune enfants rêvent, c'est admirable. On s'attache à ce personnage. On veut tout comprendre, tout connaitre les trucs. On veut surtout savoir si c'est possible dans la vrai vie. Ce que j'ai...( read more) aimé plus que tout dans ce film, c'est la fin. Comme dans la musique, la première et la dernière note font la beauté d'une pièce. Dans les films, on critique souvent la fin, mais celle-ci est à tomber debout ! (c'était voulu en passant :P) Excellente fin ! Deux minutes avant la fin, on pense que toute est fini, mais ... la solution de toute l'histoire entière y est relié. Seul bémol, un peu long selon moi. Aurai pu être plus court, surtout pour le contenu.

    « La vie n'est qu'une illusion ! »
  • May 31, 2009
    After a long hiatus from film-watching, I came back and finished watching this. Of course, it came out at the same time as The Prestige and will likely be forever entwined in the public conscious with that other film. Maybe not "forever," I guess, but certainly for a long ...( read more)time. I've seen The Prestige, saw it in theatres, in fact, and heard long ago that the films really oughtn't be compared. That's not going to stop me, of course, but I am going to note the reasons I don't disagree with the idea that they aren't to be compared, per se (even as I'm doing it). I took interest in the film mostly for Edward Norton, Rufus Sewell and Paul Giamatti, though I'd heard mostly disappointing or middling reviews of the film.

    A young Edward, also known as Eisenheim (Aaron Johnson) finds himself friendly with young Sophie, also known as Duchess von Teschen (Eleanor Tomlinson) despite their class differences, and even find themselves drawn instinctively to love with one another. It's not to be, though, and the Duchess is taken away from him before they can escape together. Eisenheim disappears, too, and learns more fully the arts of illusion, returning to Vienna later to practice this art on stage (and now played by Norton). At a show, his volunteer is none other than Duchess von Teschen (now played by Jessica Biel), though she is volunteered rather than choosing the role herself, by her future husband, the Crown Prince Leopold (Sewell). The two recognize each other, and Eisenheim begins to trade wits, pride and shame with Leopold, who is arrogant and cold in his actions, holding pride over all else. Police Chief Inspector Walter Uhl (Giamatti) is set on Eisenheim's trail to disgrace him as fraud, only for everyone's plans to be tripped up by an unexpected accident, leading Eisenheim to act even more outwardly aggressive toward Leopold, who attempts to hold his grown out of his stubborn belief in his own worth.

    The similarities between this film and The Prestige are passing and simplistic: both deal in magic and illusion, are period films and work on competition between two male leads. There are other connections to be drawn, certainly, but in general they are entirely dissimilar films. The Prestige--an irony considering its title--is less interested in spectacle and more interested in morality and philosophy, character motivation and depth, setting aside story as the vehicle to examine these things. The Illusionist is all about spectacle; it is entertainment in its entirety, a story told to tell a story, with devices and bells and whistles to give it character and identity. This isn't to say it's utterly shallow or without any thought behind it, but rather that it is not interested in wrapping itself too tightly in such ideas. There is flirtation with the idea of enlightenment and retaliation against this rather pragmatic approach to life and reality, and on the absurdity of class division, but it primarily centers on the idea of illusion or magic (and which Eisenheim practices), and on the story of the love he and Sophie share. It's almost a fairy tale in this respect, a simple love story wrapped behind a simple story spiced with the fantastic.

    There's a strangeness to the entire film, being as the real stumbling block of the film is the script. It's not a bad story, nor is the dialogue stilted in terms of word choices, but it is rather bare. Norton and Giamatti actually come off a bit lost with this, trying to bring character to roles that are not written up enough to contain much. Both have strong and clear presence physically, but suffer the De Niro-Period-Effect (which I first discovered watching The Mission, and consists of a feeling of inherent anachronism when some actors perform in period pieces) to a degree whenever they open their mouths. Both maintain their (admittedly light) accents rather solidly, but seem to be a bit too focused on keeping their words short and clipped to match the feeling of the language they are mimicking by accent. Sewell and Biel actually do best in their roles, Sewell simmering and feeling just shy of explosion as the conceited and proud Prince, sure of his own worth and the lack of worth of others. Biel shows a defiance and independence that is matched by her devotion and love for Eisenheim--nothing terribly fancy or complex, but well performed (in spite of my previous impression of Biel, which was probably most coloured by Marcus Nispel's terrible remake of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre--leading me to write her off as a hollow pretty face).

    What makes the film, though, is the experience of it. DP Dick Pope was Oscar-nominated and deserved it, with a very rich, thick feeling of colour throughout the film, often very dark but lit well enough to hold the lines of all the important details, and with little nudges toward elder silent film via iris lens transitions and the occasional circular frame that mimics the darkened corners of the inferior exposure process used in early film, as well as even flickering for the scenes of the young lovers. There's a fantastic mix of stage, screen and painting in many scenes, in the sense that the world feels constructed and planned like a stage show, artfully balanced like a painting and near-real like film. It's quite beautiful, and often just shy of distractingly so. Behind this we of course have the sound of a Philip Glass score, which caught my ear before I even saw his name, and began waiting to see who it was--and was reminded that I, in fact, did actually know this but had forgotten. It matters not, though, because Glass' music is fantastic as usual, and that's more relevant than the fact that it was him who wrote it. It bears that signature repetition of Glass' work, but with that lovely building of permutation that seems almost mathematical and yet perfectly organic--perhaps like the rigid but natural formation of crystal (or maybe the prisms on the cover of his Glassworks are just stuck in my head).

    Director Neil Burger has very astutely assembled the parts to make a beautiful film, and one that I didn't see as focusing on plot--though this is harped on most by critics--because it seems consciously hollow of this based on its focus on the visual and auditory experience, which is only enhanced by the feeling that Norton and Giamatti's best work in the film is all visual. Don't watch hoping for or expecting a transcendently original plot, because it isn't about that. Keep that in mind and you ought to enjoy yourself thoroughly.
  • March 16, 2009
    The Prestige owns this movie...but it's good none the less.
  • December 6, 2009
    Don't bother with this movie. The Prestige was heaps better. But it may be like choosing between Nirvana and pearl Jam.
  • November 22, 2009
    what a wonderful film...
  • November 21, 2009
    Good one!! Good twist!!
  • November 20, 2009
    Excellent mystery film, with a twist of an ending you will not believe.
  • November 19, 2009
    The story line was unexpected and extremely clever. Edward Norton was amazing. He is in all his movies, but this one is definately right up there. Cast was great, some really good actors. Very sweet and romantic.

Critic Reviews


August 25, 2006
Moira MacDonald, Seattle Times

While Burger's screenplay isn't always graceful, the movie's lovely enough that you might not notice. full review

August 21, 2006
David Edelstein, New York Magazine

The ending dispels a lot of the magic, but the silent-movie palette is gorgeous, and the film is worth seeing for the inspired hamming of Paul Giamatti as Vienna's chief inspector. full review

August 18, 2006
Claudia Puig, USA Today

The alluring and absorbing Illusionist proves that a film need not be mindless fluff or ridiculously far-fetched to qualify as escapist entertainment. full review

August 18, 2006
Mick LaSalle, San Francisco Chronicle

The Illusionist is a rich and elegant film, full of sly, devious characters with complicated motives. full review

August 18, 2006
Stephanie Zacharek, Salon.com

I have vague recollections of some of the actors' trying too hard, and of places where the story dragged like a tired peacock's tail. But ultimately, by God, I succumbed to the picture's faux-laudanum... full review

August 16, 2006
Nick Schager, Lessons of Darkness

A handsomely constructed but decidedly minor sleight of hand. full review

August 4, 2006
Peter Travers, Rolling Stone

The Illusionist curls around you like a smoke ring, which only enhances its mysterious allure. full review

View more The Illusionist reviews at RottenTomatoes.com

Comments


  • krukru0520
    December 10, 2008
    so so great!
    the screenplay was awesome. yo would think of something for its ending and wow, you will be shocked at the end!
    nice nice story! greatmagic.
  • WrellikW
    July 25, 2008
    This was an excellent movie and recommend it to all.

    Take care all,
    William
    Zzzzooooommmmmm!

    "It is easy to be brave, from a distance." -American Indian Proverb-
  • xXxCAITLYNxXx
    April 30, 2008
    OMG lol on me but... i just remembered today taht I saw this movie at the cinemas when it first came out. LOL but I remember that it was awesome and wont say what else cos i never know what ruins it for people. so yeah :) I liked it.
  • ChimiChanga21
    January 31, 2008
    The twist at the end it's a bit predictable but the rest of the movie is really original and a true love story. If you haven't seen it yet, you really should rent it/ buy it/or something else, just see it!!!!
  • carbadi09
    October 26, 2007
    Excellent! The ending was unexpected to me... what I really thought was that the actress could never die that way without an espectacular reappearence.
    Esta película es una de las mejores... la duquesa no podia morir de esa forma sin hacer una espectacular reaparicion como la vista en este drama. La actuación y la ambientación de todo el escenario fue único. Cinco estrellas bien ganadas.
  • topycaru
    August 19, 2007
    Really amazing what makes it so great is that you could never guess the ending. The "magic" aspect is also great
  • ruggie2007
    July 30, 2007
    IT WAS THE SECOND BEST MOVIE I HAVE EVER SEEN IN MY WHOLE LIFE!!!!I GAVE IT A 100, 5 STARS, TWO THUMBS UP AND A 10!!!! THIS MOVIE MAKES THE PRESTIGE LOOK LIKE A PILE OF COW DUNG (WHICH IT WAS ANYWAY) ANYWAY COMMENT ON MY PAGE PLEASE IM NEW!!!LOL
  • EdwardAndMe
    July 28, 2007
    this is my favorite movie in the intier world!!!!!!!
  • Valdes305
    July 18, 2007
    This movie was spectacular and i would recommend that everyone see it espacially if you like magic..Jamie
  • Aria625
    July 2, 2007
    Dude this movie was spectacular! I would definitely see this again. Love your flicks!

Critic ratings and reviews powered by RottenTomatoes.com

Fresh (60% or more critics rated the movie positively)

Rotten (59% or fewer critics rated the movie positively)

Official Trailer

More Like This


Click a thumb to vote on that suggestion, or add your own suggestions.

  • Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
    Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer (48%)
  • The Notebook
    The Notebook (52%)
  • The Lake House
    The Lake House (56%)
  • Scoop
    Scoop (20%)

Facts


No facts approved yet. Be the first

The Illusionist : Watch Free on TV


The Illusionist Trivia


  • Rufus Sewell has had a role on the following movies: -The Illusionist -A Knight's Tale -The Legend of Zorro What do this character have in common?  Answer »
  • a film that has a suprise ending after a disappearing act and giving clues to the prince killing his women  Answer »
  • What movie set in Vienna, has a magician who uses his abilities to secure the love of a woman far above his social standing?  Answer »
  • In what movie was a magician arrested for insulting a prince with his tricks and contacting the spirits of the dead?  Answer »

Recent News


No recent headlines. Got one?

Most Popular Skin