The Informant! Reviews and Ratings



  • December 6, 2009
    It did annoy me , Matt Damon's performance.
  • December 5, 2009
    An unconventional movie in the sense that it is not meant to entertain but perhaps to get viewers thinking. If one can appreciate the depth of the character of Whitacre, this would be an interesting character study. Else watching the dynamics of the characters and how the lies pl...( read more)ay out make this a compelling show but not exactly a gripping one. Tends to get boring in some parts. But in staying true to its subject matter it's a good telling of a potentially dry case. Mostly though, only people fascinated by the subject matter and people who can identify with Whitacre would enjoy the movie I suppose.
  • December 5, 2009
    At the beginnig I was confused, later on I felt bored..
  • December 4, 2009
    Kind of Slow but great ending
  • December 4, 2009
    it is so nice to see somethings.
  • December 3, 2009
    Matt Damon is a cool guy
  • November 30, 2009
    Goes on a bit too long, but really quite funny.
  • November 28, 2009
    I didn't really want to see this film, but there was nothing else in the pictures so we went, I was quite comfused about it, thats all I have to say about this film , it was comfusing
  • November 28, 2009
    Matt Damon is not a good comic actor. If the Ocean films didn't prove that, then 'stuck on you' did and this just compounds that evidence. The problem is that the film wasn't full-on comedy (even the black comedy fails) or full-on drama. It failed across the board. By the end...( read more) of the film, I was get annoyed with the main character and his flaws. It the film was played straight and reasoning giving for his affliction, I might have been engrossed but since they played much of it for laughs, they just managed to annoy me. David Mitchell would have honestly done a much better job at playing the lead because at least the internal monologues would have been comically timed and delivered. Not an offensively bad film but a poor effort. One to avoid.
  • November 26, 2009
    worstb movie to hit cinemas this year
  • November 24, 2009
    I don't think I have enjoyed watching Matt Damon on screen more than this.
  • November 23, 2009
    The informant is that kind of movie that at the end of the movie you go out thinking and wondering what you saw. But after certain time you realize that you saw and intelligent , very sarcastic and incredible movie. It is a film about ising corporate star, Mark Whitacre, who turn...( read more)s whistleblower against his employer, agribusiness giant ADM, for price fixing. Its story is very good and the plot is very well developed. The movie at the beginning is a little slow and maybe tiresome but the last hour when the situations began to unwrap, it becomes very interesting and with a very fast pace. The music is really enjoyable The cast is very good, a very fat Matt Damon in a type of role you never imagine him to be, Melanie Lynskey as Damon's wife was quite decent and after being away fro I don't know how much time, Scott Bakula with and excellent peformance. In conclusion, Steven Soderbergh latest movie is a very interesting movie people should give it a chance, it totally worth it.
  • November 23, 2009
    Rcommended by scottydgibbs.
  • November 23, 2009
    I have to say that I thoroughly enjoyed this film and was quite surprised by Matt Damon's subtle yet intriguing performance as well as the fine direction from Soderbergh and fantastic musical score. It is sharper than fellow conspiracy film "Burn After Reading," and stands on its...( read more) own with more serious and gritty whistleblower films like "The Insider," and "Michael Clayton."

    Although it was quickly forgotten at the box office and dismissed by a number of reviewers, I would definitely recommend this little gem. I can only hope that it is a sign of what's to come with Steven Soderbergh. Maybe a return to the glory days of films like "The Limey," and "Out of Sight," and "Erin Brockovich." Check out the amazing supporting cast as well, including Scott Bakula, Joel McHale, and Patton Oswalt.
  • November 22, 2009
    matt damon is exellent as the informant of the piece, letting the f.b.i know of a price fixing scam in his company,and from there getting inway over his head, damon is this film, but some superb direction from soderdberg, using his loose style seen in his films like traffic, the ...( read more)limey and oceans films, the film flys by as we watch damon bumble his way, through plot,and also we learn not all is what it seems, a exellent score, which adds a lot, and nicely set early 90s setting, even scott bacula coming back from the dead, as the f.b.i agent in charge, is exellent to watch, soderdberg has shown with this type of material, a great film can be made
  • November 21, 2009
    Matt Damion keeps coming back as a sly cunning backstabbing rat prick in his roles...I'm starting to think he's attracted to these characters in that he is what he plays...either that or he's typecast as a flawed character....he was very good in the Bourne movies...so you know h...( read more)is potential... like with Good will Hunting as well. Oh well he's still a good actor....but If I saw this movie I'd just get mad.
  • November 21, 2009
    I really enjoyed this movie. I was one of the only ones in the theater laughing though realizing a lot of it was dark humor. The voice-overs in this movie kind of annoyed me. Very interesting character though.
  • November 21, 2009
    i like Matt Damon...want to see more of the film
  • November 20, 2009
    The first half of the movie was boring, the second half was better. Matt Damon's acting was great and so was Scott Bakula's performance. It's a nice comedy/parody especially when you know that this movie is based on a true story. A pity that the 1st half of the movie was boring...
  • November 19, 2009
    A straightforward, visually austere comedy with a great performance by Matt Damon who elevates the film beyond mere farce.
  • November 18, 2009
    I was so disappointed in this movie! It was one of the dumbest movies I have ever seen... save your money on this one!
  • November 18, 2009
    Want to see it for Matt Damon
  • November 17, 2009
    I was bored, but it was well made. This type of story does nothing for me but I am sure it does something for some people.
  • November 17, 2009
    A very interesting and funny film, with a cool set and costume design (go 70's fashion!), a nice direction and editing, and a very nice, fun story. Damon steals the film with his dorky, naive, yet mysterious character. Go!
  • November 14, 2009
    Two and a half stars may seem a little harsh, considering that it was well written, clever and Matt Damon did a great job portraying his character....... I just don't really care if I ever see it again! The story line maxed out it's limit of interesting halfway through the show, ...( read more)after words was just painful repetition. I vote see it once... then be done with it.
  • November 13, 2009
    O filme é mais uma vítima da burocracia narrativa de Steven Soderbergh.
  • November 10, 2009
    Loved it! Damon does an amazing job of projecting this sleezy duelistic character. The take on the period (1960's) is spot on.
  • November 10, 2009
    I expect it's totally awesome
  • November 8, 2009
    Strong on all fronts. Def appreciated the slow reveal.
  • November 5, 2009
    Informing For Dummies

    This movie was not the laugh-out-loud comedy that the trailer depicted. Its humor is more subtle. There are some good laughs to be had and watching Matt Damon in a somewhat goofy role is a real treat. Damon is supported on all sides by a wonderfully ensemb...( read more)led supporting cast, especially Scott Bakula, Melanie Lynsky, and Joel McHale. The story is crisp and ultimately dumbfounding, as we discover who the main character really is..a pathological liar. It's amazing that all this was happening at a place a little more than 100 miles from where I live.
  • November 1, 2009
    funny but not interesting
  • October 31, 2009
    This fool was crazy az hell ,and they say some real shit lol.
  • October 31, 2009
    If this was (only) fictional I would find the guys who wrote it genious ...knowing that this was "based on a true story" I must say don't buy any thing from Cypress Systems ;) and go see it!
  • October 28, 2009
    Steven Soderbergh's third effort to be released in the last 12 months (fourth if you count "Che" as two pictures) is "The Informant!", a comic corporate thriller about real-life whistle-blower Mark Whitacre. Whitacre, who suffered from bipolar disorder, became notorious as being ...( read more)the highest-ranking executive in U.S. history to snitch in a case of corporate fraud. In the end, Whitacre succeeded in revealing Archer Daniels Midland's price-fixing tactics, but meanwhile wound up with a prison sentence three times longer than the criminal executives he successfully exposed.

    Matt Damon, who gained thirty pounds for the role, dons an ugly toupee and a mustache for the task of playing Whitacre. He's not your typical hero - he never quite tells the whole truth, he often blatantly lies, and he displays the intellect of a 9-year-old with severe attention deficit disorder in the process. Through inner monologue, Damon's Whitacre often indulges his wealth of useless trivia while receiving briefing by the FBI - facts about polar bears, butterflies, and the panties of young girls in Japanese vending machines.

    Whitacre becomes involved with special agent Brian Shepard (Scott Bakula) after revealing a huge price-fixing scheme on lysine, an amino acid, concocted by agribusiness giant ADM. For two and a half years, Whitacre wears a wire, providing hundreds of tapes for the ongoing investigation. In the process, however, Whitacre's ignorance jeopardizes the entire case - he narrates his tapes, introducing everyone he encounters by name and job title, and even starts fiddling with his Nagra device during a business meeting with the executives he's in the process of exposing.

    Soderbergh doesn't let us too close to Whitacre - we share the frustrations of the FBI agents and lawyers trying to get a straight story out of him. While a lesser actor might make such a character frustrating, however, Damon has such an abundance of charisma that he's pleasant company throughout. We may groan when, later in the film, Whitacre attempts completely asinine counter-lawsuits against both ADM and the FBI, but no matter how deep he digs himself into a hole, we're always pulling for him. Whitacre, often saying that the conspiracy is like "something out of a Crichton novel", pegs himself to be a super-spy - 0014, in fact, as he's twice as smart as 007.

    Damon will probably be an oversight come Oscar season, but it may be one of the actor's very best performances. The supporting cast is all wonderful, as well, from Melanie Lynskey as Whitacre's wife to the terrifically deadpan Scott Bakula. "The Informant!" is yet another film in Soderbergh's repertoire that solidifies him as one of the most interesting, and certainly one of the most diverse, American directors working today.
  • October 26, 2009
    Really good movie, well acted (obviously Matt Damon is in it) and good plot. I adored the dialogue with the voice over!
  • October 25, 2009
    Loved the music. Liked Matt Damon's acting. Unattached to the plot.
  • October 24, 2009
    I came out of this movie with mex feelings, I guess is that it was so well written and acted that I got into the plot and really experienced what everyone in the movie itself , I was very frustrated with the main character. I guess they really got me in, which speaks very well a...( read more)bout the director and actors. You should go see this and judge for yourself...Liked the movie no doubt...
  • October 24, 2009
    Contrary to what Ayn Rand may have told you, corporations are for the most part evil. When left to their own devices they will gladly screw over their competitors, their employees, and their customers if it will make them a little more profit. This is why they make such effective...( read more) Hollywood villains, they have a long history of activities that would make Darth Vader blush and deep down they have almost no remorse. Since every villain needs a hero to vanquish them, Hollywood has invented someone to put a white hat on: the whistleblower. While the whistleblower genre probably doesn?t have as many websites dedicated to it as other sub-genres, it?s actually a pretty populous category of film and like most things that are done to death people are beginning to get a bit sick of its pattern of self-riotousness and manufactured drama. So, when it came to light that Steven Soderbergh was making adapting the story of real life whistle blower Mark Whitacre it was safe to guess we?d get something more than standard genre fare, and from the moment the film?s trailer came out it was clear that was the case.

    Based on the nonfiction book by Kurt Eichenwald, this film tells the story of the man who helped the FBI conduct one of the biggest price fixing scams in American History. This investigation began when the company called in the FBI to deal with an extortion scheme reported by Mark Whitacre (Matt Damon), an executive in the lysine division of ADM. Shortly into an investigation by agent Brian Shepard (Scott Bakula), Whitacre reveals that he and his colleagues have been illegally conspiring with other companies to systematically drive up prices worldwide. Whitacre agrees to wear a wire and collect evidence against the company he works for, and in doing so is able to collect an unprecedented amount of evidence for the FBI. Whitacre claims he?s doing this to clear his conscience, but he doesn?t really seem all that torn up about lysine consumers, so why is he doing this? That will turn out to be the key question at the heart of all of this, because Mark Whiticre is not exactly what he seems.

    The conventional wisdom about Steven Soderbergh is that he does big budget studio produced films filled with celebrities in order to build the cache required to make low budget experimental films starring non-actors. Because of this reputation critics are inevitably going to deride this as one of the former, but really this whole notion is something of a misnomer. This may have a bigger budget than something like Bubble and it may star an A-list celebrity, but deep down the way this film handles genre is just as experimental as a lot of those other projects. If you go to one of those seminars they have to teach screenwriters how to build successful formulaic films step by step, the first thing they?ll tell you is to focus on a character with a clear motivation and to have that motivation drive the plot. As such, this would have largely focused on the goal of bringing down ADM and stuck with this conflict throughout if this were a conventional film. Instead, this movie becomes defiantly disinterested in the fate of ADM and instead focuses on what the title says it will focus on the informant.

    This informant himself is a pretty odd character played brilliantly by Matt Damon. Whiticre is a strange person who seems more like Ned Flanders than Deep Throat. He?s in his forties, has a bad comb-over, and a goofy looking mustache. More importantly, the guy?s a doofus; he?s the antithesis of the intense image of businessman that Gordon Gecko embodied. At times Whiticre seems to not grasp the stakes of his actions, and the film?s voice over track is clouded by his odd stream-of-consciousness musings about subjects ranging from the German word for pen to the thinking patterns of polar bears. This man?s existence is certainly one of those ?truth is stranger than fiction? type creations and making him believable had to have been a hefty challenge. Fortunately Matt Damon brings Whiticre to the screen excellently. It takes a little while for Damon?s achievement to really sink in, but when you compare his performance here to the badass he was when playing Jason Bourne and it becomes immensely clear how much of a range Damon has as an actor.

    Because Whiticre is so strange many have come to label this movie a spoof, but I?d hesitate to use that term simply because it conjures images of broadly comic films like Aireplane and Scary Movie, and this film is neither as silly as those films nor is it trying to be as funny. However, this film does play with genre conventions in a way that?s not completely unlike what spoof films do. This is a movie that easily could have focused other elements, chosen a different tone, and used different techniques and end up looking like a remake of The Insider. Instead Soderbergh is able to make this movie a completely different through a handful of unexpected decisions. For example, the film has adopted a very 1970s aesthetic (even though the story is set in the early 90s), this would seem like a logical enough choice if one was trying to channel the corporate thrillers of that era like The China Syndrome, Serpico, and Silkwood, but it isn?t really the serious filmmaking of the 70?s that he?s channeling. Rather, Soderbergh is channeling everything that was kind of tacky about the era like the gaudy font the captions are in or the unexpected but compelling smooth jazz score by Marvin Hamlisch. As such, the film?s aesthetics sort of play with what we?re supposed to expect from this kind of movie just as much as the script does.

    Ignoring all the genre trickery we do still get what is on its own a very fascinating story. Mark Whitacre is an enigma, one that has not been completely cracked by the time the credits role and a big part of the joys of this film are trying to figure out just what makes him tick. What?s more strange is that aside from some of his more self-sabotaging habits, Whitacre isn?t too different from most corporate executives. He?s a man who lies, cheats, and steals almost as a habit then hides behind an ?aw shucks? smile, the only difference is that he seems to believe his own bulls--t. In focusing on this personality we get a much better look at the face of corporate crime than we ever would watching the heroes take down another anonymous board room filled with mustache twirlers. While I wouldn?t place this in the upper echelon of Soderbergh?s work, this is a movie that deserves as much respect and analysis his movies which wear their experimental nature like a badge of honor.
  • October 24, 2009
    É engraçado, mas faltou alguma coisa.
  • October 24, 2009
    La folie douce. Je connais des gens pareils!
  • October 21, 2009
    was an out standing movie really kept me interested whole time, even better knowing this guy is for real yes based off real story , agian excellent
  • October 20, 2009
    Sorry...It went over my head...Hopefully.
  • October 18, 2009
    Somehow I could understand him in this role (relationship between wife and him)
  • October 18, 2009
    Top performance by Matt Damon
  • October 18, 2009
    The fact that this is a true story made the movie even better. Matt Damon did a great job portraying this odd man. You end up feeling just as confused as Mark Whitacre probably felt in the contradictions of his mind.
  • October 18, 2009
    Stupid - cooked food from the sky yeah that works for idiots but not sentient beings
  • October 18, 2009
    Okay?. Looks like a weard movie, dont wanna see ittt, not at all..
  • October 17, 2009
    It get's a little boring at first, but it becomes better after Matt Damon actually receives his version of a bipolar personality.

Summary


The Informant! Summary